Daily Press Briefing
- THE SECRETARY
- $200 million in Assistance to Palestinian Authority / Fact Sheet
- Meeting with Prime Minister Maliki of Iraq / US-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement Higher Coordinating Committee Meeting
- Announcement soon on Africa travel
- MIDDLE EAST
- Special Envoy Mitchell is currently in Abu Dhabi / Arrive in Damascus on Saturday / Meeting with President Asad on Sunday / Travel to Jerusalem on Sunday / Will also visit Egypt and Bahrain
- Ambassador Holbrooke was in Ghazni province today
- A/S Gottemoeller completed a round of post-START talks in Geneva
- US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue / North Korea will be discussed
- US will return an Ambassador to Syria
- US remains in touch with both parties / No response to latest plan / US does not support acts that precipitate violence / Focus should remain on President Arias' mediation efforts
- NORTH KOREA
- US calls for the journalists to be returned home as quickly as possible
- No capacity in Iran to be able to respond to US offer of engagement
- Meetings took place several months ago / Part of a broad dialogue / Took place with knowledge of Iraqi Government officials
- US is not undercutting the Iraqi Government
1:48 p.m. EDT
MR. CROWLEY: Just a few announcements: we’ll have a fact sheet for you this afternoon that goes through in some detail the issues of the $200 million in assistance that the Secretary and the prime minister just talked about.
Clearly, you’ll see the Secretary again this afternoon in a couple of hours. She will, of course, host Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki for a bilateral discussion and the – a meeting of the – the first meeting of the – in-person meeting of the U.S.-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement Higher Coordinating Committee. There was a meeting that took place via video conference right at the end of the Bush Administration, hosted by -- or led by Secretary Rice. But this is the first time that the groups will get together in person, and there will be a variety of discussions on economic issues, investment, (inaudible) to broaden the frame of the U.S-Iraqi relationship, moving towards the Strategic Framework Agreement that the two countries have committed to.
The Secretary mentioned George Mitchell. He met today with the crown prince and foreign minister in Abu Dhabi, and will arrive in Damascus tomorrow for a meeting with President Asad on Sunday. Then Sunday, he will travel to Jerusalem. While there, he will meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Defense Minister Barak. He will also, of course, meet with President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad.
Richard Holbrooke continues his trip to Afghanistan. Today, he was in Ghazni province, is overnighting in Kabul. And finally, Assistant Secretary Rose Gottemoeller has completed a negotiating round with her Russian counterparts in Geneva, making – continuing to make positive progress, following up on the summit last month and working – or this month, and working towards a replacement START agreement by the end of the year.
And of course, just a flag again, obviously, next week Secretary Clinton and Secretary Geithner and, actually, a wide range of cabinet officials, including the President, will have the strategic and economic dialogue with their counterparts from China.
With that, I’ll take your questions. Libby.
QUESTION: Quickly, on the Asad meeting. Is this the first meeting with Asad? Would – did he meet with him last time?
MR. CROWLEY: I think he – they’ve met before.
QUESTION: Okay, they have.
MR. CROWLEY: But obviously, it will be not only as the Secretary described, looking at where we stand on a comprehensive peace agreement, it will include the Syrian track. They’ll talk about the range of bilateral issues as well, including our joint interests in a stable Iraq.
QUESTION: But didn’t they announce last week that she go soon in Africa? Would you have some details on this trip?
MR. CROWLEY: I expect – we – she will be going to Africa, leaving in early August. And we are – we should have a trip announcement, formal trip announcement, out soon. I have not seen it as of yet. I’m not sure why.
QUESTION: Janine Zacharia of Bloomberg.
MR. CROWLEY: Hi.
QUESTION: The Secretary said you’re sending an ambassador back to Syria. Has that person been named, and when are they going back?
MR. CROWLEY: We have agreed with the Syrians to return an ambassador. We obviously have to go trough the confirmation process, which means announcing a candidate and then having them formally nominated, and go through the confirmation process. So I think it’ll be still some time to accomplish that.
QUESTION: You said that Rose Gottemoeller had made progress in the negotiations. Are they on track to –
MR. CROWLEY: I think part of what they did today was, given the significant push that the negotiations received from President Obama and President Medvedev, and now they use this session to kind of organize a work plan that will take them through the end of the year, and we hope to the completion of a negotiation.
QUESTION: On Honduras, what is your reaction?
QUESTION: Can we just stay on Mitchell for one second?
QUESTION: We weren’t on Mitchell.
MR. CROWLEY: I’ll come back to you. Go ahead.
QUESTION: Okay, yeah. On Honduras, what is your reaction to President Zelaya still kind of going against the advice to not return? He’s still saying he’s going to return, possibly this weekend. And then also, if the Arias-led talks continue to fail and not really produce much, does the U.S. have any sort of plan to maybe step in and propose something else?
MR. CROWLEY: Well, let’s take it one step at a time. First, we continue through Ambassador Llorens in Honduras to stay in touch with both parties. I don’t think that either side has formally responded as of yet to the Arias plan that he put out earlier this week. We understand that President Zelaya is in Nicaragua as we speak. We, obviously, would not support any action that would precipitate violence, and we understand that President Zelaya actually plans to come to Washington on Tuesday for further discussions.
QUESTION: Well, have you advised him not to make the trip into Honduras? I mean, do you – when you say you don’t support any action that could precipitate violence, do you include his return as such action?
MR. CROWLEY: I think we have said to President Zelaya on a number of occasions that right now, we think the focus should remain on the current negotiating and mediation effort of President Arias, and that any return to Honduras would be premature.
QUESTION: I know Secretary Clinton’s been traveling the last 24 hours, but has she raised this issue with Zelaya personally?
MR. CROWLEY: I’m not aware that she has spoken to President Zelaya. In fact, she has not spoken to President Zelaya.
QUESTION: Who is he going to meet with on Tuesday when he comes?
MR. CROWLEY: I think his intentions are still being worked out.
QUESTION: And can I just ask, back on the Middle East, can you just – I know we’re getting fact sheet later. This $200 million is money that she pledged in March in Sharm el-Sheikh?
MR. CROWLEY: This is part of the tranche. I think roughly speaking, she made a $900 million pledge in Sharm el-Sheikh earlier this year. I think this tranche brings us about halfway through that.
QUESTION: Also on the Middle East, is this Senator Mitchell’s first meeting with Asad or did he meet --
MR. CROWLEY: I don’t think so. I think they’ve met before.
QUESTION: He did meet with him last time? Thanks.
MR. CROWLEY: This is his second trip to Damascus that I --
QUESTION: I just asked.
QUESTION: You already did?
QUESTION: She doesn’t listen to my questions.
QUESTION: No, I’m still on vacation mode. I’m sorry about that.
MR. CROWLEY: (Laughter.) Yes.
QUESTION: (Inaudible) newspaper. I just wanted to ask you about the significance of his visit to the Emirates today. I mean, I know that he’s seen other countries, you know, other leaders in the region. But what is the significance of the Emirates visit?
MR. CROWLEY: Well, obviously, as I think the Secretary has pointed out, we need action by all parties in this process. The Israelis have responsibilities, the Palestinians have responsibilities, other nations in the region have responsibilities. As I think I’ve already mentioned, he’ll be going to Egypt on this trip. He’ll also be going to Bahrain.
But we’re touching base with leaders on every trip just to make clear that as this process goes forward, one of the critical elements we’ll need will be making sure that there is support in the region for the difficult decisions and compromises that are going to have to be made if and when we do get into formal negotiations.
QUESTION: Have you reached any agreement with the Israelis on the settlement issue?
MR. CROWLEY: I’m sure that will be a subject of Senator Mitchell’s meetings on Sunday.
QUESTION: P.J., when Mitchell was in here a couple of weeks ago, he seemed to have – be a little more forward-leaning about the progress that’s been made, and that didn’t seem to come through with the Secretary’s comments today. How far apart are you on the settlements issue?
MR. CROWLEY: Well, no, I think, as the Secretary said, we’re having very earnest negotiations with all of the parties, and we’re making sure that we can have clear understandings of where we are, and in doing so, create the conditions that allow a negotiating process to begin. And then obviously, once you’re in a negotiation process, there are clear issues that will have to be resolved, and many of those need to be resolved as part of final status negotiations.
So I think he wants to be clear that all sides are creating the conditions, putting themselves in positions so that when we begin a formal negotiating process, we’ve put ourselves in the best position to have a successful outcome.
QUESTION: Would you say he’s encouraged by the talks?
MR. CROWLEY: Well, I would say that he continues his efforts to create those conditions, as he said when he was here, for a negotiation to begin. As I recall, I don’t think he put a timetable on this, but obviously said we want to do this as soon as possible.
QUESTION: Can I change topics?
MR. CROWLEY: Sure.
QUESTION: North Korea. Just on the journalists again, actually, I’m wondering if all this sort of war of words that’s been happening the last few days, is that affecting your efforts at all? Can you give us an update on what kind of communication, perhaps, the Swedish ambassador has had with them? And do you know about their whereabouts? Just a general kind of status report.
MR. CROWLEY: I’m not aware that there is any change. Obviously, we have made clear we would like to see the journalists returned home as quickly as possible. Our protecting power has had contact with the journalists regularly. I’m not sure it’s been recently, however.
QUESTION: But is it by phone, or can you elaborate on that? How do they --
MR. CROWLEY: I think it’s been a combination, but I don’t think there’s been contact in a few days.
QUESTION: And there – any U.S. consular access allowed whatsoever?
MR. CROWLEY: June 23rd is the last one.
QUESTION: June 23rd, and that was a phone call or a visit?
MR. CROWLEY: Yeah. I think --
MR. WOOD: It was a visit.
MR. CROWLEY: That was a visit, yeah.
QUESTION: A visit by the Swedish ambassador?
MR. CROWLEY: Yeah.
QUESTION: And can you also tell me are the girls in a penitentiary or are they in – what kind of circumstances are they in?
MR. CROWLEY: I would be reluctant to go in any kind of detail on that.
QUESTION: New topic. The Secretary talked a bit about Iran in an interview yesterday. She said the Iranians appear to be unable to, you know, make a decision about the American diplomatic overture. And I wonder whether the Administration’s thinking on this September deadline is evolving at all, given that there’s this political turbulence within Iran now.
MR. CROWLEY: I think, as the Secretary said – I think she used the term “capacity” – is right now, there does not seem to be a capacity within Iran to be able to significantly respond to the offer of engagement that we have made in a number of different frames. We’ll have to wait and see where Iran is and at what time they determine that they can kind of give us an indication of what they are either willing to or are able to do.
Obviously, from our standpoint, there are a number of possibilities. We’ve talked repeatedly about the importance of the P-5+1 process. That will be one opportunity. But there are other avenues for engagement and potentially for cooperation in the context of Afghanistan and, of course, bilateral. But the ball is clearly in Iran’s court, and obviously, right now, the government has its hands full.
QUESTION: Just a question about U.S.-China strategic dialogue next week: The Secretary had said this week that North Korea will be part of the discussions with the Chinese. Are there plans for separate breakout meetings on North Korea in particular? How will that work?
MR. CROWLEY: There are blocks of time where you’ll have a particular focus, and blocks of time where there will be bilateral issues and there will be regional issues. But I would think there will be significant time devoted to the situation in North Korea.
QUESTION: What does she want to hear from the Chinese on North Korea?
MR. CROWLEY: Well, she actually had the opportunity to talk to the Chinese during the ASEAN forum. So I think this is just ongoing dialogue, comparing notes in terms of implementation of 1874, and taking stock of whatever developments have occurred since they last met. So I just think, given this is a very high-level meeting, and to have the opportunity for intensive discussions over a couple of days, I would expect that North Korea will be a significant topic, but obviously one among many.
QUESTION: But do you think it’s a – I don’t mean to get too much into housekeeping, but do you think it’s a breakout issue of its own?
QUESTION: Or do you think that this will be part of the kind of foreign policy?
MR. CROWLEY: Well, there’ll be a block of time where the United States and China will talk about regional issues. And I think when you talk about regional issues, security issues, foremost on people’s mind at this point is the situation in North Korea.
QUESTION: On Iraq, I just wanted to ask you if there was any follow-up regarding the Iraqi cabinet’s statement that they would be sending an official letter to the American Embassy and the Turkish Embassy regarding this so-called secret protocol. Did your embassy actually receive a letter thus far regarding this?
And the Iraqis have said they’re asking clarification from Americans, so is there going to be verbal clarification, anything written? What’s the story on that one?
MR. CROWLEY: I can’t tell you if we have received a formal letter regarding this issue. Obviously, it has received some public attention. And from a U.S. standpoint, the meetings that may be the subject of – had occurred some months ago, part of a broad dialogue that diplomatic and military officials have with a wide range of interested parties in Iraq. And as we understand it, the meetings did occur with the knowledge of officials within the Iraqi Government.
But obviously, to the extent that there are views in Iraq that this is somehow undercutting the Iraqi Government, from our standpoint, clearly, we have a great deal invested in the relationship between the United States and Iraq and we would do nothing to undercut that.
QUESTION: On a different topic, are you aware if there’s been any international law violated in relation to the American citizens involved in the New Jersey scandal with the black market (inaudible) they’re running?
MR. CROWLEY: Try me again.
QUESTION: Are you aware of any international law violations also being brought with the allegations involving the New Jersey black markets --
MR. CROWLEY: I’ve seen the report of the arrests. But beyond that, I think we’ll wait for the investigation to proceed.
QUESTION: Thank you.
(The briefing was concluded at 2:04 p.m.)
DPB # 124
# # #